| Our
courts are either corrupt or there is something
seriously wrong with the regulations to permit
sitting duck loans. You too, could be a
victim of Identity Theft.
On
January 30th, 2009 the Ontario
Court of Appeal's
decision (Docket: C49171) in the Tony Crawford -
Bank of Montreal case, resulted in Mr. Crawford
having a debt estimated at $250,000,00
without a trail. Take a look at "The Tony
Crawford Story.
I
was not stunned or shocked when I witnessed the
decision being handed down to deny a trial in
this matter. I expected it. However,
after listening to Mr. Crawford's lawyer state
his case, I thought to myself, "yes
there will be a trial, there has to be."
Mr. Crawford's lawyer did an excellent job of
presenting the facts in this matter, despite
being allowed only twenty minutes to do so. The
Bank of Montreal's lawyers did not even have to
make a case. How come? It is just not that
simple a case, unless the decision to deny the
trial was pre-determined and that is what I
think, It appears to me, our court system
is corrupt.
The
three judges recessed for 10 minutes after Mr.
Crawford's lawyer made his case. When they
returned with their decision, denying Tony
Crawford access to the justice system, I sensed
there was a fix on.
The
fix I assume was "no way, this case
could go to trail." It is too
similar to Asset Backed Commercial Paper Loans
used by the banks. It is also an exact
match to the number one tax evasion scam at the
top of the 'Dirty
Dozen'
list in the US IRS website:
If
Mr. Crawford was granted a trial, then all banks
in Canada could be questioned and subjected to
fraud charges for their practices of
Identity theft, which is exactly what
happened to Mr. Crawford.
After
studying all the facts and I hope you will too,
it is clear Mr. Crawford was a victim of more
than just identity theft. He is also a
victim of a corrupt court system in Canada or
Government system designed to protect the
world's most powerful elite's control over the
Canadian banking system, through democracy
Chinese style.
Despite
a third reading of www.Petition44.com
at Queen's Park for an investigation into
identity theft and predatory lending practices -
there are several worrying aspects from a
case history ten-years in litigation involving
nine judges in six hearings.
The
main point is, Canadian courts brush aside crime
as 'Buyer Beware' that allows con artists to
continue to take advantage of an easy scam with
no recourse. There are no regulations for
consumer protection and people find themselves
in debt to trick loans. The Canadian court
system refuses to deal with banks that collude
with third parties selling sleazy tax shelter
schemes. In my opinion signature theft is a
crime that takes possession of a person's
property by fraudulent misrepresentations in
financial markets.
Crawford's 'Buyer Beware' case is one of many a Toronto
Star article
refers
to as 'Borrower Beware' concerning other debtors
trick into debt to bank loans behind investment
schemes. The courts find no fault with banks
when people signatures on investment contracts
are transformed into additional personal loans
processed outside the scope of banking
regulations - it can happen to anyone.
It is clear people will continue to be victims
of a type of fraud evidenced in the scope of the
global credit crunch. It is also clear Canadians
are denied their right to a trial. It is clear
Canadians are denied a right to have their
allegations followed up.
It
has been a 9 year struggle for Tony and he
proves his point. This beyond doubt. His
well documented evidence is published in
his books and on his websites.
The
bottom line is "He states he was a victim
of a sitting duck loan conspiracy backed by the
Bank of Montreal." All he wants is a chance
in court to prove he would never have committed
to the original investment if he had to put up
the collateral which he never had to back up a
loan for $110,000.00 in the first place.
He certainly has made his point well enough to
have had a trial.
The
essence of their decision (I assume) was based
on the the fact that Tony failed to read the
loan documentation
- the perfect sting of Identity Theft and
the fact that the loan documentation makes it
clear that there is no genuine issue for a trial
in relation to the Bank of Montreal.
Tony
needs all Canadians to know and support him.
He is not a quitter. He will seek advice
from his lawyer on how to appeal the decision
that we now have. A total of five judges
ruling on the case rather that the elements of
the case raising issues for a trial. The result
is debt without trial. |
